SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Config file for SL7.5 in mock
From:
Mark Stodola <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Stodola <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:51:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
On 10/26/2018 09:07 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
> I have successfully used mock in Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 to build rpms 
> to run under Scientific Linux (as well as ones to run natively.)
> 
> At first I used a locally written config file, but more recently 
> /etc/mock/epel-7-x86_64-rpmfusion-free.cfg has worked.
> 
> It is based on /etc/mock/epel-7.cfg, which is also installed in SL, but 
> refers to, and uses, the centos repos.  Are conflicts likely?  Is there 
> an SL version?
> 
> John P

You should be fine for most things.  It wouldn't take much to just copy 
the epel cfg to a new one and customize the repositories to use the SL 
(or better, local mirror) ones.

I keep a custom cfg anyway so I can set the 'dist' value to reflect that 
I built the packages and they aren't from another repository when deployed.

-Mark

ATOM RSS1 RSS2