SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:32:25 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Toby Darling wrote:

> Hi
>
> We've picked up kernel-3.10.0-693.21.1.el7 errata released last week,
> however there is a problem building kernel modules, eg beegfs fails to
> build:
>
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64'
> arch/x86/Makefile:166: *** CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y, but not supported by the
> compiler. Toolchain update recommended..  Stop.
>
> [root@term12 build]# yum list gcc
> Installed Packages
> gcc.x86_64                                    4.8.5-16.el7_4.1
>                          @sl-fastbugs
>
> My reading of https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0408 suggests
> that gcc-4.8.5-16.el7_4.2 is required for support for retpolines in
> kernel-3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.
>
> Is this on the roadmap?

Last week this appeared in the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list:
> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:59:35 -0600
> From: Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Security ERRATA Important: kernel 
> on SL7.x x86_64
>
> An updated gcc that supports this option is scheduled for publication on
> Tuesday.

Has anyone tried with the newer compilers in the softwarecollections repo ?
Not sure how safe it would be to use a different compiler for a kernel 
module but softwarecollections does give access to gcc/g++ v4.9.2 v5.3.1, 
v6.3.1 and v7.2.1 ...

-- 
Andrew C. Aitchison					Cambridge, UK
 			[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2