SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Where to report bug?
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:51:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Lars Behrens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Am 31.01.2018 um 14:37 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
>
>  Scientific Linux is a rebuild of Red Hat, so that looks like it should
>> be reported to Red Hat, https://bugzilla.redhat.com
>
> But will they accept it with:
>
> [...]
> os_release:     Scientific Linux release 7.3 (Nitrogen)
> [...]
> pkg_vendor:     Scientific Linux
>
> After all I am not a paying Redhat customer.

If you're clear about which kernel you're using, with what hardware or
virtualization tools, it can help them see whether their paying
customers have the same issue. Or their CentOS users, who compile
things from the same Red Hat published source trees, and for whom the
CentOS git repository is now the reference source repository for RHEL
projects.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2