SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"aleksander.baranowski" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
aleksander.baranowski
Date:
Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:27:10 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Hi,
I'm patching PackageKit url's with changed not-rhel.patch

Scientific src.rpm:
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7.4/SRPMS/SL/PackageKit-1.1.5-1.sl7.src.rpm

Bests,
Alex

On 01/02/2018 04:07 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/02/2018 08:48 AM, aleksander.baranowski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to rebuild some package for SL7. Package in original has both
>> (64 and i686) arch. Some systems has i686 version already installed. I
>> rebuild package with my patches, but rebuild is x86_64 arch only :(. So
>> during update there is broken dependencies problem (src.rpm build also
>> noarch packages).
>>
>> I'm mostly building packages with epel mock + custom repo, but I also
>> tried to build on "normal" host - every time with same results.
>>
>> I know that there was sl-mock-config project on bitbucket but link is
>> dead :(.
>>
>>  From build time of x86_64 and i686 packages I deducted that they are
>> built separately.
>>
>> Any information about correct flow for building x86_64 with/and i686
>> version of packages would be appreciated.
>>
>> Bests,
>> Alex
> 
> Hello,
> 
> What package are you trying to rebuild?  For SL7 we are building i686
> and x86_64 packages with koji.
> 
> Pat
> 

-- 
GPG INFO: 6D5A4CAF 2016-05-17

ATOM RSS1 RSS2