SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:26:12 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Dear List,

I learned something I did not realize about EPEL
(Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux):

 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#What_is_Extra_Packages_for_Enterprise_Linux_.28or_EPEL.29.3F

     "EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts
      and will never conflict with or replace packages in the base
      Enterprise Linux distributions."

So basically, if you need something fixed or updated that is
already in RHEL, EPEL will not update beyond RHEL.

And if you really, really need something fixed, you are at
the mercy of RHEL or you  have to ask Nux!, who is a
blooming genius that this kind of thing.

In my experience, Nux! will respond to a request in a couple
of days.  If RHEL does respond, it will be in a couple of years.
Nux! is the best bet.

Interesting and makes sense when you think about it.

-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2