SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:37:20 -0600
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Ken Teh <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Subject:
Re: 389-ds fastbugs or epel
From:
Ken Teh <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory
Comments:
To: scientific-linux-users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Never mind. I was confused by the yum list output. I thought I was looking at 
only the epel listing as I thought I had disabled all other repos except epel.


On 11/28/2017 11:48 AM, Ken Teh wrote:
> Epel has many more 389-ds rpms as opposed to the main SL repos (specifically, 
> fastbugs) which only has 3 rpms.
> 
> Can someone advise which ones to install? From epel or SL?
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2