Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:25:22 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Just a question related to EPEL. Anyone know how active the epel user
mailinglist is?
Last weekend a spf package from epel was updated on my mail server via
yum-cron. Since
then my mailserver has not received any mail outside of my trusted
networks. Just
found that out today. Signed up for the epel-user lists and wrote a
message, but no
one has responded yet.
On 2017-10-30 03:30, Bill Maidment wrote:
> I've found a new directory in x86_64 called Packages which seems to be
> a duplicate of the x86_64 directory
> So it now takes up twice the space.
>
> -----Original message-----
>> From:Steven C Timm <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 13:06
>> To: Bill Maidment <[log in to unmask]>; ~Stack~ <[log in to unmask]>;
>> scientific-linux-users <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: EPEL Download
>>
>> I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6
>> directories.
>
>> Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not.
>>
>
>> Steve Timm
>> -----------
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Bill
>> Maidment <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM
>
>> To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users
>
>> Subject: RE: EPEL Download
>
>> It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a
>> b c etc or has it always been like that?
>
>> I only mirror 6/7 x64
>
>> Cheers
>
>> Bill
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> -----Original message-----
>
>> > From:~Stack~ <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> > Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08
>
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>
>> > Subject: Re: EPEL Download
>
>> >
>
>> > On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:
>
>> > > Hi
>
>> > > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure without warning.
>
>> > > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota.
>
>> >
>
>> > I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't
>
>> > checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious
>
>> > looking at my upstream mirror.
>
>> >
>
>> > ~Stack~
>
>> >
>
>> >
|
|
|