SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:09:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
If memory serves, SL7 has "Less Brittle Kerberos"[1] where as SL6 does 
not.  This could account for why one works and the other does not.

Pat

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LessBrittleKerberos

On 10/18/2017 07:10 PM, Stephen Isard wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:12:46 -0400, R P Herrold <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Howard, Chris wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible the two boxes are talking to two different servers?
>> as the initial post mentioned and showed it was using remote
>> host lists to a pool alias, almost certainly --
> Oh, I took the question to be about the kerberos server.  Yes, you are right,
> ntpd -q returns different results on the two machines.  However, as I said in the original post, the time on the two machines is the same to within a very small amount., well within the five minute tolerance used by kerberos.  So I don't understand why it should matter that the two machines have arrived at the same time by syncing with different servers.
>
>> as a way around, set up ONE unit to act as the local master,
>> and then sync against it, to get 'site coherent' time
> Could you tell me how to do this, or point me at a document that does?
>
> Thanks.
>
>> [a person with more than one clock is never quite _sure_ what
>> time is correct ;) ]
>>
>>
>> for extra geek points, spend $25 on AMZN, and get a GPS USB
>> dongle; run a local top strata server (the first three
>> lintes of the following)
>>
>> [root@router etc]# ntpq -p
>>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay
>> offset  jitter
>> =============================================================================
>> GPS_NMEA(0)     .GPS.            0 l    -   16    0    0.000
>> 0.000   0.000
>> SHM(0)          .GPS.            0 l    -   16    0    0.000
>> 0.000   0.000
>> SHM(1)          .PPS.            0 l    -   16    0    0.000
>> 0.000   0.000
>> +ntp1.versadns.c .PPS.            1 u  665 1024  377   51.817
>> -12.510  19.938
>> *tock.usshc.com  .GPS.            1 u  294 1024  377   34.608
>> -8.108  10.644
>> +clmbs-ntp1.eng. 130.207.244.240  2 u  429 1024  377   31.520
>> -5.674   7.484
>> +ntp2.sbcglobal. 151.164.108.15   2 u  272 1024  377   23.117
>> -6.825  10.479
>> +ntp3.tamu.edu   165.91.23.54     2 u 1063 1024  377   63.723
>> -3.319  16.813
>> [root@router etc]#
>>
>>
>> configuring ntp.conf is not all that hard
>>
>> -- Russ herrold

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2