SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:47:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On 08/18/2017 10:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 11:36 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> Scientific Linux 7.4 BETA x86_64
> One difference noted with the new kernel:
>
> < 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 , > 3.10.0-693.1.1.el7.x86_64
> < Loaded X.509 cert 'Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory: Scientific Linux 7
> driver update signing key: 98ec7b1456fb6a6b00e81292343a0ff7268df821'
> < Loaded X.509 cert 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux kernel signing key:
> b16621330191464ae7b898c695711cc90ab7e673'
> ---
>> Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate (-65)
>> Loaded X.509 cert 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux kernel signing key:
> 3302b956c2bd5d15c673dcb1f75e428b1
>
> Haven't noticed any problems though.
>


Interesting, looks like somehow x509.genkey got through unpatched. I'll 
get it fixed.

Thanks for the report!

Pat

ATOM RSS1 RSS2