SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:56:43 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
> 2017-07-12 21:44 GMT+03:00 ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On a previous post, I was asked why I was always asking about releases.
>> I responded that Red Hat would fix my bugs, but slate them for future
>> editions.  Here is an example:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356288#c14
>>
>>          "It's currently planned for 7.5."
>>
>> It was reported under 7.2.  They have fixed it, but won't
>> release it until 7.5.
>>
>> I do sincerely appreciate them fixing bugs, but the delays involved
>> are something to behold.
>>
>> When I asked them if there was some workaround till them,
>> there response was:
>>
>>          "The best way would be to contact your support
>>          representative, who'll then guide you through the
>>          possible options."
>>
>> And I clearly stated I was coming from the community.
>>
>> The "double edged sword" of EL Linux can be a real pain
>> in the neck at times: stability by freezing packing
>> versus aggravation for not fixing bugs in those
>> frozen packages.  EL Linux defeats the purpose of
>> Kaizen (continual improvement).
>>
>> EL Linux is still a good package though, despite its
>> aggravations.
>>
>> -T

On 07/12/2017 01:13 PM, Oleg Sadov wrote:
 > A possible solution -- creating of your own respin and support the
 > parallel branches of packages that you corrected, before fixing them
 > by the TUV. For example, in our SL respin -- NauLinux we supported our
 > own branches of kernel and Evolution (corresponded to upstream
 > updates) about half a year until TUV repaired the bugs which we
 > described in RH bugzilla, just because it was important for our users.
 >

Unfortunately, it is over my head.  :'(

What I have been doing is slowing moving everything over to Fedora
(26 just came out).  I am working on my second Fedora server
this afternoon for a customer.  RHEL doesn't work on the C236 chipset.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353423

They won't work on the issue as they don't have the hardware.
I gave them Supermicro's phone number to ask for some.  Supermicro
will assist big companies with those issues.  But Red Hat did not
bother.

And since the Server I am buildig today is a real close match,
I offered to run whatever tests on it that they liked before
installing Fedora.  THEY GOT CRABBY WITH ME.

There is something weird about Red Hat lately.  It is
getting harder to get them to fix anything and they
get CRABBY about it.


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2