SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Repositories question
From:
John Pilkington <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Pilkington <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:42:53 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
On 10/07/17 20:19, Stan Orlov wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I run SL 6.9.  After initial setup, I ended up having 5 Yum repositories:
> 
> atrpms-repo-7.7.el6_90 (x86_64)
> atrpms-repo-7.7.el7 (x86_64)

I used to use atrpms, but the last update that I see at dl.atrpms.net 
was in September 2014.  I haven't seen anything on the mailing list 
since 2015.  Maybe someone else has more info, but...

> elrepo-release-6-6.el6.elrepo (noarch)
> epel-release-6-8 (noarch)
> rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el6.rf (x86_64) sig
> 
> One thing in particular is two versions of atrpms. Do I need only one?  If I remove one, will it remove the packages installed using this repo?
> 
> Also, are these proper repo versions for SL 6.9?
> 
> Cheers,
> Stan
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2