This particular email was sent to the errata list, but the reply-to 
header is set to the users lists...

On 06/21/2017 02:47 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
> Aha.
> Thanks for that. How many mailing lists do we need???
> I got confused (not difficult at my age) as the response came on the User list.
>
> Anyway, I echo the response. The team always seems to be on top of security issues.
> Thank you (and the community) for being so friendly and helpful.
>
> Cheers
> Bill
>
> -----Original message-----
>> From:Hans Kristian Rosbach <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday 21st June 2017 17:30
>> To: Bill Maidment <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Security ERRATA Important: kernel on SL6.x i386/x86_64
>>
>> I think that mail came from the
>> [log in to unmask] list, so you might
>> have been removed from that list for some reason, but not from the users
>> list for example.
>>
>> --
>>   Hans Kristian Rosbach
>>   Servebolt.com / Raske Sider
>>
>> On 06/21/2017 12:41 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
>>> Hi. Is there something wrong with this mailing list? I received this response, but I never received the original message. This is not the first time I have noticed this.
>>> Cheers
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original message-----
>>>> From:Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday 21st June 2017 2:58
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: Security ERRATA Important: kernel on SL6.x i386/x86_64
>>>>
>>>> Kudos to the SL team at FNAL for once again getting the updates for a really nasty issue out incredibly quickly. Impressive.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Stephan Wiesand
>>>> DESY -DV-
>>>> Platanenenallee 6
>>>> 15738 Zeuthen, Germany
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>