SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: is the sha256sum of SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Apr 2017 09:19:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Good catch.  Somehow the signature got reverted to the RC image.

The correct signature is 
68992289a1163250ba064c23baa8c4b23d11e5dc0562de41971bdf9c2ad42415

I'll get a new set of SHA files posted.  Sorry for the error.

On 04/01/2017 03:06 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the following hash the correct one?
>
> 13650ef94c16024285fd9dadebba4d62a33c0de5ac611314bf8e3d6afb956a3a  SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Fred

ATOM RSS1 RSS2