SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:08:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Jose Marques <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 10 Apr 2017, at 18:23, David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> But I'll give you that Oracle is probably a very different beast on
>> the legal side and doesn't have a too good "open source karma".
>
> ZFS on Linux is based on OpenZFS
> (<http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page>). Oracle has no input into its
> development as far as I can tell.

I'm not sure that David S is referring to. Sun open-sourced zfs and it
was at zpool version 28 when Oracle closed-sourced it. So the cat's
out of the bag up to v28. But the Solaris version's currently 36
(IIRC) and, in openzfs, you can enable extra, post-v28 features on a
case by case basis.

[Someone said up-thread that you couldn't expand a pool (or add disks
to a pool). That's incorrect. You can add a same-type vdev to a pool.]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2