SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:09:29 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
On 05/04/17 11:50, David Sommerseth wrote:
> ZFS looks great, so does btrfs - on the paper.  But until ZFS is native
> in Linux or btrfs stabilizes on the same level as ext4 and XFS, I'm not
> going that path for production environments :)

Just to be clear, when I say "ZFS is native in Linux" - I do mean
included and available as a build option in the upstream Linux kernel.
In my opinion, the OpenZFS [1] effort is not "native" in this regard.

[1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenZFS>


-- 
kind regards,

David Sommerseth

ATOM RSS1 RSS2