SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: is the sha256sum of SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
From:
Fred Liu <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Fred Liu <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Apr 2017 04:39:14 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
G



> -----Original Message-----

> From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

> Sent: ÐÇÆÚÒ», ËÄÔÂ 03, 2017 22:20

> To: Fred Liu; [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] is the sha256sum of

> SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?

> 

> Good catch.  Somehow the signature got reverted to the RC image.

> 

> The correct signature is

> 68992289a1163250ba064c23baa8c4b23d11e5dc0562de41971bdf9c2ad42415

> 

> I'll get a new set of SHA files posted.  Sorry for the error.

> 

> On 04/01/2017 03:06 AM, Fred Liu wrote:

> > Hi,

> >

> > Is the following hash the correct one?

> >

> > 13650ef94c16024285fd9dadebba4d62a33c0de5ac611314bf8e3d6afb956a3a

> SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso

> >

> >

> > Thanks.

> >

> > Fred

ATOM RSS1 RSS2