SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerard Lally <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Gerard Lally <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Mar 2017 10:16:37 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 14:06:57 -0500 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

> There is also a very active "centos-virt" mailing list, and tools
> published by the CentOS virtualization group that use far more recent
> versions of Xen which may be helpful to you. I'm not very satisfied
> with RHEL's pursuit of KVM as a distinct virtualization technology,
> rather than working with the older and for some systems more efficient
> Xen tools. Which virtualization technology to use is a long, opinion
> filled, and even political subject. We could take a look at it, if
> people are interested.

Apologies if this post ends up mangled - my first post here and I don't know how to quote message to which I am replying.

I for one would be interested in a discussion about Xen in SL. I much prefer Xen over KVM. I believe another contributor here, Steven Haigh, makes Xen packages available for SL. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2