I will make small mirror locally then test it again. It's not likely
that 3 times in row installation hang on same package, but still it's
worth trying.

Bests
Alex

On 03/29/2017 04:35 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> If it's not a repo problem, when I see such errors they are usually due the networking breaking down mid-install - typically because NetworkManager discovers another interface it likes better than that meant to be used for installation and moves the default route to it.
> 
> - Stephan
> 
>> On 29. Mar 2017, at 15:52, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the report!
>>
>> I uncovered an unrelated bug in libguestfs, but the repo error is new information.
>>
>> I do show that version of libguestfs in the repo.
>>
>> I'll see about double checking the repodata correctly synced up to the distribution servers.
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> On 03/29/2017 08:27 AM, aleksander.baranowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tested SL 6.9 x86_64 with netimage
>>> [http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/SL-6-x86_64-netinstall.iso]
>>> you gave us.
>>>
>>> Installation was on libvirt/qemu/kvm.
>>>
>>> Installation process went as follow:
>>>
>>> 1) Test disc - OK
>>> 2) Select default options for network configuration in URL submenu
>>> 3) Put url
>>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/
>>> 4) Wait for retrieving install.img etc...
>>> 5) Wait for graphical installer. Next -> Install anyway (alpha/beta
>>> infobox).
>>> 6) Hostname sl69
>>> 6) Basic Storage Devices
>>> 7) Zone - Warsaw, then set root pass.
>>> 8) Use All Space twice, on third try I made manual partitioning.
>>> 9) Customize now -> Install all package group except language support,
>>> without adding optional packages in any group.
>>> 10) Install
>>> 11) There is error - "libguestfs-1.20.11-20.el6.x86_64.rpm cannot be
>>> opened. This is due to a missing file, a corrupt package or corrupt
>>> media. Please verify your installation source."
>>> Screenshot included.
>>>
>>> I tried on 3 different installation, (one with only 20 gb of disc space,
>>> so I make it bigger 40 gb, when same package had problem I thought that,
>>> this might be bug, but to be sure I made 50 gb installation with manual
>>> partitioning, same result)
>>>
>>> I would love to hear if anyone else can reproduce.
>>>
>>> Bests
>>> Alex