Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:35:25 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If it's not a repo problem, when I see such errors they are usually due the networking breaking down mid-install - typically because NetworkManager discovers another interface it likes better than that meant to be used for installation and moves the default route to it.
- Stephan
> On 29. Mar 2017, at 15:52, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> I uncovered an unrelated bug in libguestfs, but the repo error is new information.
>
> I do show that version of libguestfs in the repo.
>
> I'll see about double checking the repodata correctly synced up to the distribution servers.
>
> Pat
>
> On 03/29/2017 08:27 AM, aleksander.baranowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tested SL 6.9 x86_64 with netimage
>> [http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/SL-6-x86_64-netinstall.iso]
>> you gave us.
>>
>> Installation was on libvirt/qemu/kvm.
>>
>> Installation process went as follow:
>>
>> 1) Test disc - OK
>> 2) Select default options for network configuration in URL submenu
>> 3) Put url
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/
>> 4) Wait for retrieving install.img etc...
>> 5) Wait for graphical installer. Next -> Install anyway (alpha/beta
>> infobox).
>> 6) Hostname sl69
>> 6) Basic Storage Devices
>> 7) Zone - Warsaw, then set root pass.
>> 8) Use All Space twice, on third try I made manual partitioning.
>> 9) Customize now -> Install all package group except language support,
>> without adding optional packages in any group.
>> 10) Install
>> 11) There is error - "libguestfs-1.20.11-20.el6.x86_64.rpm cannot be
>> opened. This is due to a missing file, a corrupt package or corrupt
>> media. Please verify your installation source."
>> Screenshot included.
>>
>> I tried on 3 different installation, (one with only 20 gb of disc space,
>> so I make it bigger 40 gb, when same package had problem I thought that,
>> this might be bug, but to be sure I made 50 gb installation with manual
>> partitioning, same result)
>>
>> I would love to hear if anyone else can reproduce.
>>
>> Bests
>> Alex
|
|
|