SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:03:00 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> Working on it.
>
> --
>
> Connie J. Sieh
> Computing Services Specialist III
>
>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Al Russell wrote:
>>
>>> I have been unable to get the SL6 openssl update to 8.4 that was announced in
>>> today's Scientific-Linux-Errata. When I check the SL6 sl-security repository
>>> all I find is the openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm family. Is there a
>>> problem or am I missing something?
>>
>> I see openssl-1.0.1.el6_8.4.i686.rpm
>> but since I have openssl-1.0.1.sl6_8.3.i686 installed,
>> the 8.4 version is not seen as newer (sl... > el...).
>>
>> Worse, having managed to install the 8.4 (with
>>    yum downgrade openssl*1.0.1e-48.el6_8.4
>> )
>> yum wants to "upgrade" me back to 8.3 :-(
>>
>

openssl*1.0.1e-48.sl6_8.4 is in the upload process now.  It will soon be 
available .

ATOM RSS1 RSS2