SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:20:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Working on it.

--

Connie J. Sieh
Computing Services Specialist III

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
630 840 8531 office

http://www.fnal.gov
[log in to unmask]

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Al Russell wrote:
>
>> I have been unable to get the SL6 openssl update to 8.4 that was announced in
>> today's Scientific-Linux-Errata. When I check the SL6 sl-security repository
>> all I find is the openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm family. Is there a
>> problem or am I missing something?
>
> I see openssl-1.0.1.el6_8.4.i686.rpm
> but since I have openssl-1.0.1.sl6_8.3.i686 installed,
> the 8.4 version is not seen as newer (sl... > el...).
>
> Worse, having managed to install the 8.4 (with
>    yum downgrade openssl*1.0.1e-48.el6_8.4
> )
> yum wants to "upgrade" me back to 8.3 :-(
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2