SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:29:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
On 03/02/17 17:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> SL6 uses OpenSSL v1.0.1, which is no longer supported by OpenSSL
> ( https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html ).
> v1.0.2 which may be a drop in replacement is supported until the end of
> 2019.

Just wanted to point out that regardless of OpenSSL's life cycles, Red
Hat will continue to support, backport and fix issues with OpenSSL
v1.0.1 as long as they have a distribution shipping with that version.

> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1530413
> explains Red Hat's position on this, but it can only be read by
> those with a Red Hat contract.

That URL basically says what I just said in the previous paragraph.
Otherwise - as already pointed out, for many of these KB articles, you
just need to have a free account.  I would highly recommend people to
sign up there, as there's lots of good info here.

> Could SL make a similar statement which is available to anyone who
> has access to SL ?
> 
> I'm particularly asking since I'm trying to build the latest exim,
> which does not support openssl v1.0.1
> https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20170131.025153.592b38db.en.html
>    As we are into 2017, the oldest OpenSSL supported by the OpenSSL project
>    is 1.0.2, so that is now the oldest version which the Exim Maintainers
>    formally "support" for Exim. As of yet, I do not believe that any
>    changes have been merged which would break support for older OpenSSL,
>    but you are on your own if you try to use such.

There seems to be a Fedora EPEL package with Exim 4.88 ready for EL6
already: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=835727

> I can of course build a local OpenSSL v1.0.2 for exim, but if there were
> a system version it would be simpler for me.

OpenSSL 1.0.2 as a system package will require a rebuild of all packages
depending on OpenSSL 1.0.1.  Which is why Red Hat rather puts efforts
into keeping 1.0.1 up-to-date by backporting fixes from newer upstream
releases.  Doing that often requires less resources and keeps a far more
stable environment in a longer run.



-- 
kind regards,

David Sommerseth

ATOM RSS1 RSS2