SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:41:53 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hi,

> On 12 Jan 2017, at 11:14, Paul Myers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hi 
> 
> Can you help with this? 
> 
> The rpm's in the latest repos (this week's updates) seem to be corrupt, We have tested other mirrors containing these rpm's also which also seems to have the same issue we are still investigating but these are causing failures when when run kickstart downloads 
> 
> 7.2/x86_64/os/Packages/pangomm-devel-2.34.0-3.el7.x86_64.rpm 7.2/x86_64/os/Packages/p11-kit-trust-0.20.7-3.el7.x86_64.rpm 7.2/x86_64/updates/security/pciutils-libs-3.5.1-1.el7.x86_64.rpm 
> There also appears to be a corrupt file in the 7.3 repo, although I have not tested this as yet. 7.3/x86_64/os/Packages/pangomm-doc-2.34.0-3.el7.noarch.rpm 
> All files for 7.2 are the incorrect size and are dated November 2008.  The file for 7.3 is dated May 2014.  This affects syncs via rsync.  We have tested against most repos and have got the same result.

that's strange. On our (rsync) mirror, the 7.2/7.3 files in all cases you mention are actually hardlinked and thus identical. They verify just fine too.

	Stephan

>  The http repos appear not to be affected. We are going to grab the rpm's from Centos libraries which are looking ok
> 
> Thanks
> Paul Myers 

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany

ATOM RSS1 RSS2