SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:46:46 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 04:00:00AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 5:19 PM, David Sommerseth
> >
> > ... systemd is far better documented than any other init system
> > I've used over the last 15+ years or so.
>
> daemontools was much lighter, much cleaner, and well documented. It
> never took off due to ...
>


I am amused to see how systemd-based CentOS-7 seems to run ok on
RaspberryPi-type of machines (single core 1GHz CPU, 0.5GB RAM,
10Mbytes/sec "disk", Pentium3 back to the future).

I think we will see a return of daemontools or something equally (or more)
light weight, and not only to save on memory, cpu and i/o footprint.

People who tinker with these systems are not old school unix sysadmin
heavyweights, there is no patience (no time) to learn complicated
things like systemd or firewalld, no matter how well documented they are,
if complexity stands between me and my tinkering, out it will go,
let's see how quickly.


-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2