SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: bad repo metadata for 6rolling x86_64 repo
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:31:29 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (991 bytes) 

> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os:
>
> The repomd.xml file gives this data for comps-sl6-x86_64.xml:
> <data type="group">
>  <checksum 
> type="sha256">5e38507007409ccc863281f963797b363a56ddf5ae608d79e6c0b38b38276ecc</checksum>
>   <location href="repodata/comps-sl6-x86_64.xml"/>
>   <timestamp>1467224386.84</timestamp>
>   <size>1221445</size>
> </data>
>
> but the actual size of comps-sl6-x86_64.xml is 1221381, and the actual 
> sha256sum is 9a355e051eaf644805f86db52f97ac79a96fd4165f85747b6b5288aca4d343ee
>
> Could you please take a look? This is breaking our installs.
>
> Thanks,
> -Mat
> -- 
> Mátyás (Mat) Selmeci
> Open Science Grid Software Team / Center for High-Throughput Computing
> University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Computer Sciences
>
>

Checking now.

Just a comment.  The rolling tree is our development tree.  It should only 
be used when you are testing our development tree.   The released trees 
are

   6.1/
   ...
   6.8/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2