SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: bad repo metadata for 6rolling x86_64 repo
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:46:58 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1325 bytes) 
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Connie Sieh wrote:

>
>>  http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os:
>>
>>  The repomd.xml file gives this data for comps-sl6-x86_64.xml:
>>  <data type="group">
>>  <checksum
>>  type="sha256">5e38507007409ccc863281f963797b363a56ddf5ae608d79e6c0b38b38276ecc</checksum>
>>    <location href="repodata/comps-sl6-x86_64.xml"/>
>>    <timestamp>1467224386.84</timestamp>
>>    <size>1221445</size>
>>  </data>
>>
>>  but the actual size of comps-sl6-x86_64.xml is 1221381, and the actual
>>  sha256sum is
>>  9a355e051eaf644805f86db52f97ac79a96fd4165f85747b6b5288aca4d343ee
>>
>>  Could you please take a look? This is breaking our installs.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>  -Mat
>>  --
>>  Mátyás (Mat) Selmeci
>>  Open Science Grid Software Team / Center for High-Throughput Computing
>>  University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Computer Sciences
>> 
>> 
>
> Checking now.
>
> Just a comment.  The rolling tree is our development tree.  It should only be 
> used when you are testing our development tree.   The released trees are
>
>   6.1/
>   ...
>   6.8/
>
>
>

I have fixed the repomod.xml file for the 6rolling x86_64 tree.  rolling 
means change because it is a development tree and NOT a released tree.


Again note that this is not a released tree.  Please use the

    6.1
    ...
    6.8  <- 6x

tree.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2