SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:01:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On 12/30/2016 01:14 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> In conclusion
> Either one is good. Learn them both at least superficially. Tinker and play with them and see which one is right for you.

Perl's big advantage (over C) is that you can code twice as fast. The code
run twice as slow, but that is another issue.

And, if you are a sloppy programmer, Perl is truly a "write only"
language.  It becomes impossible to maintain.

I personally use Top Down that I learned with Pascal and Modula 2.
My Perl programs are easy to maintain.  Some Perl scripts I
have looked at, I just have to shake my head.  What in the world
is going on.  There is no enforcement of good programing
practices in Perl.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2