SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:24:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On 31 July 2016 at 23:31, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 07/30/2016 11:36 PM, Jon Brinkmann wrote:
>>
>> Does 'nmap -sX <address-range>' fit the bill, e.g.
>> 'nmap -sX 192.168.1.1-255'?
>
>
> Only one the one network (192.168.1.0/25 in your  example).
>
> I want EVERYTHING on the network
>

Todd,

1) You asked for help and you are acting like a child demanding more
candy when you didn't get the flavor you wanted.
2) nmap is a very complicated swiss army knife tool. There are
hundreds of things it can do but you need to take some time to figure
them out and get what you want. Expecting that you will get the answer
handed to you is being unreasonable.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=nmap+tutorial
3) what you are wanting is actually a multi step process. First you
need to see what mac addresses are on the network which usually only a
smart switch can tell you. You can sort of get the data with a
mac-ping but it isn't guarenteed to work. After you get all the mac
addresses on the network then you can work out what ip addresses or
hardware those mac addresses think they are. Again easier with a smart
switch.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2