On 08/03/2016 07:49 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 3 August 2016 at 00:56, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 08/01/2016 06:24 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>> On 31 July 2016 at 23:31, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> On 07/30/2016 11:36 PM, Jon Brinkmann wrote:
>>>>> Does 'nmap -sX <address-range>' fit the bill, e.g.
>>>>> 'nmap -sX 192.168.1.1-255'?
>>>>
>>>> Only one the one network (192.168.1.0/25 in your  example).
>>>>
>>>> I want EVERYTHING on the network
>>>>
>>> Todd,
>>>
>>> 1) You asked for help and you are acting like a child demanding more
>>> candy when you didn't get the flavor you wanted.
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> I am trying to find a replacement for an important tool I use
>> on a frequent basis.   I have been very clear about what
>> I am after.
>>
>> If you do not understand what I am after, please just ask me instead
>> of insulting me.
>
> You are correct. My line was insulting and ill behaved. I apologize to
> you and everyone else.
>

No Problem.  I appreciate your help and your friendship.
Many years my friend.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~