SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:00:29 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
That could probably be Connie atm.

CC'ed into this thread.

On 2016-07-28 16:08, Stijn De Weirdt wrote:
> hi fredric,
> 
> i confirm, things seem ok with the centos rpm
> 
> quick inspection of the rpms also does not show something obviously
> wrong (both rpms ship same files with same sizes).
> 
> i took the centos rpms, modified the release using rpmrebuild
> (rpmrebuild --release=18.el6_8.0.fromcentos -p thecentosrpms) for all
> libcgroup rpms and added them to one of our local repos. yum is happy 
> again.
> 
> how do we report this to the SL packagers? (or do we just assume they
> read all these mails?)
> 
> stijn
> 
> On 07/27/2016 05:22 PM, SCHAER Frederic wrote:
>> Same here.
>> Hey ! This seems SL specific... !?
>> 
>> I installed this one manually : 
>> CentOS/6.8/updates/x86_64/Packages/libcgroup-0.40.rc1-18.el6_8.x86_64.rpm
>> 
>> [root@dev7247 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
>> Scientific Linux release 6.8 (Carbon)
>> 
>> [root@dev7247 ~]# rpm -qi libcgroup
>> Name        : libcgroup                    Relocations: (not 
>> relocatable)
>> Version     : 0.40.rc1                          Vendor: CentOS
>> Release     : 18.el6_8                      Build Date: Tue 12 Jul 
>> 2016 06:27:20 PM CEST
>> Install Date: Wed 27 Jul 2016 05:15:28 PM CEST      Build Host: 
>> worker1.bsys.centos.org
>> (...)
>> 
>> And cgroups seem to still work whereas they failed with the SL RPM :
>> [root@dev7247 ~]# service cgconfig restart
>> Stopping cgconfig service:                                 [  OK  ]
>> Starting cgconfig service:                                 [  OK  ]
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : [log in to unmask] 
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] De la part de 
>> ~Stack~
>> Envoyé : mercredi 27 juillet 2016 12:59
>> À : Stijn De Weirdt <[log in to unmask]>; 
>> [log in to unmask]
>> Objet : Re: sl6.8 libcgroup
>> 
>> On 07/27/2016 03:53 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> we have a update an sl67 node to sl68 (but not yet updated the 
>>> kernel),
>>> and this updates
>>> libcgroup-0.40.rc1-17.el6_7.x86_64
>>> to
>>> libcgroup-0.40.rc1-18.el6_8.x86_64
>>> 
>>> however, it now seems that the cgonfigparser even fails to validate 
>>> the
>>> distributed /etc/cgconfig.conf
>>> 
>>>> [root@test2802 ~]# /sbin/cgconfigparser -l /etc/cgconfig.conf
>>>> error at line number 17 at {:syntax error
>>>> Error: failed to parse file /etc/cgconfig.conf
>>>> /sbin/cgconfigparser; error loading /etc/cgconfig.conf: Have 
>>>> multiple paths for the same namespace
>>> 
>>> 
>>> the /etc/cgconfig.conf is the same in both rpms
>>> 
>>> anyone seeing this? or knows how to fix?
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> I discovered the exact same thing. I fully updated to 6.8 and rebooted
>> into the new kernel. I haven't filed a bug report against it yet as I
>> didn't have time yesterday to really dig into it. My "workaround" was 
>> to
>> "yum downgrade libcgroup" on all my hosts until I could figure it out.
>> 
>> ~Stack~
>> 
>> 

-- 
Steven Haigh

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: https://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897

ATOM RSS1 RSS2