On 06/17/2016 11:45 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
>
> On 06/17/2016 04:40 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
>>
>> I understand it is very lame to refer to a technical article on
>> cio.com <http://cio.com>. and yet I'll try :)
>>
>> http://www.cio.com/article/3085079/linux/goodbye-rpm-and-deb-hello-snaps.html
>>
>> I never heard of it and just wonder how much of real value is in this
>> new system.
>>
>
> Related LWN : http://lwn.net/Articles/691309/

https://www.happyassassin.net/2016/06/16/on-snappy-and-flatpak-business-as-usual-in-the-canonical-propaganda-department/

A good post giving a little bit of context for the actual snapy adoption 
by other distributions. The pres release from canonical is a bit over 
enthusiastic about adoption, security and how well received snapy is by 
others.

best Max