SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Scientific Linux 6.8 BETA 1 i386/x86_64 is now available for testing
From:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:42:38 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Scientific Linux 6.8 BETA 1 i386/x86_64              June 16, 2016
>
> These are notes of the "Alpha/Beta" releases for Scientific Linux 6.8 .
>
> Network Install Images:
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/images/boot.iso
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/images/boot.iso
>
> Iso Download area
>
> i686:
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/iso/
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/iso/README
>
> x86_64:
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/README

Connie and the SL team,

Great work. One minor issue is that SHA256SUM in the i386 directory
has incorrect file names (not matching the actual iso files). The hash
values seem correct.

Did a fresh install of both x86_64 and i386 (gnome and KDE). The
x86_64 one has been running for 5 days. All looking good.

Akemi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2