SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:20:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (101 lines)
>                    product: WDC WD1003FBYX-0
>                    version: 1V02
>                    serial: WD-WCAW35919858
> 
>                    product: WDC WD1003FBYX-0
>                    version: 1V02
>                    serial: WD-WCAW33395036


These do appear to be identical disks - same product, same series (sn WD-WCAWxxx), same fireware.

(Sometimes very different WDC disks have the same "product" name - but the serial number
will have different series, i.e. WD-WCAWxxx vs WD-CAZAxxx).

For more information, can you post the full output of "smartctl -a /dev/sdX" for both disks?

Also if you have "too many disks" connected to the machine it is possible you printed
the information from the wrong two disks.

To check against that, post the full output of "smartctl -a /dev/sdX" for *every* disk.


K.O.




On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:10:41PM +0000, Thomas Leavitt wrote:
> General Linux question, y'all seem very helpful generally, hope this is o.k.
> 
> I noticed that a disk in an mdadm software RAID10 array had been automatically removed. I pulled it, popped in a new disk that is the EXACT same model as several disks already in the system and the array... ran fdisk on it, created a partition, put a disk label on it, then tried to add it, and got "not large enough to join array" as an error message. It seems like the new disk is one sector smaller. Am I just out of luck with this disk, because the firmware has decided to nuke one sector? Makes buying spares, and having them on hand, pretty dicey if such is the case. Have two on order at the moment.
> 
> This is the second time I've been led a merry go round simply trying to replace a disk in this array, it is seriously souring me on mdadm and software RAID in general (not that I was a big fan of it anyway).
> 
> Any suggestions? This is part of a dual clustered system, two RAID10 arrays in a glusterfs, so one missing drive isn't a crisis, but obviously less than ideal.
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas Leavitt
> 
> [root@system1 ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sdb1
> 
> Disk /dev/sdb1: 1000.2 GB, 1000203837440 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
> 
> [root@system1 ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sdk1
> 
> Disk /dev/sdk1: 1000.2 GB, 1000202241024 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121600 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
> 
> 
> lshw
> description: ATA Disk
>                    product: WDC WD1003FBYX-0
>                    vendor: Western Digital
>                    physical id: 0.b.0
>                    bus info: scsi@0:0.11.0
>                    logical name: /dev/sdb
>                    version: 1V02
>                    serial: WD-WCAW35919858
>                    size: 931GiB (1TB)
>                    capacity: 931GiB (1TB)
> 
> description: ATA Disk
>                    product: WDC WD1003FBYX-0
>                    vendor: Western Digital
>                    physical id: 0.e.0
>                    bus info: scsi@0:0.14.0
>                    logical name: /dev/sdk
>                    version: 1V02
>                    serial: WD-WCAW33395036
>                    size: 931GiB (1TB)
>                    capacity: 931GiB (1TB)
> 
> [root@sapphire ~]# mdadm --manage /dev/md3 --add /dev/sdk1
> mdadm: /dev/sdk1 not large enough to join array
> 
> --
> Thomas Leavitt ([log in to unmask])
> Interim Sr. Linux IT Consultant (880 IT Services)
> 831-469-3382 (Google Voice forwards to 880 IT cell, accepts SMS)
> 1-408-454-4569 (desk)
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s). EAG, Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any errors, omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachments.
> 

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2