SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:18:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
On 03/21/2016 03:32 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> vsftp is pretty much the standard these days
>
> there is a standard package, its fairly simple to setup as a basic ftp
> server but it has a lot of options, including the ability to configure
> TLS encryption.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:04 PM, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am working on a design for a customer for an in house backup
>> repository.  I could use Samba, but Ransom Ware takes after anything
>> with a drive letter.  So I was look at Cobian Backup which allows Windows
>> machines to backup to an FTP server, thus defeating Ransom
>> Ware's ability to infect backups with drive letters.
>>
>> Cobian Backup also do not use proprietary formats.  And their
>> files would be accessible by using "ftp://local.ftp.server"
>> from Windows Explorer (not Internet Explorer).
>>
>> So, I was wondering if any of you had a favorite easy to administer FTP
>> server that was SL 7.2 friendly?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> -T
>>
>> rsync would work too, but it is not accessible through Windows
>> Explorer.  (Any time you assign a drive letter, Ransom Ware will
>> tag all your files.)
>>
>>


Hi Paul,

Thank you!

Can I set up the ftp server such that one user only has
write only access and another users has only has read
only access?  That would mess with a crypto virus something
awful!

-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2