SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 06:21:42 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (157 lines)
On 9 March 2016 06:05:04 CET, Eero Volotinen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Do you have transparent/forced proxy in network?

It happens for me also on boxes connected directly to the internet; no proxy involved.  Every single day I see this this message.


--
kind regards,

David Sommerseth 

>ke 9. maaliskuuta 2016 klo 6.53 Thomas Leavitt <[log in to unmask]>
>kirjoitti:
>
>> No feedback? Is everyone else just ignoring these messages?
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Thomas
>> Leavitt
>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:53 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older
>than
>> what we have:"
>>
>> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we
>have:
>>   Current   : Tue Feb 16 08:58:20 2016
>>   Downloaded: Tue Feb 16 08:58:13 2016
>>
>> A 7 second variance shouldn't be that much of an issue.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas Leavitt
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Leavitt
>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:52 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older
>than
>> what we have:"
>>
>> I've been meaning to write about this for a while... my inbox is
>flooded
>> every day with messages with this as the content from my SL7 machines
>(the
>> ones I have set up to forward mail sent to root). I checked the time
>on
>> them, they're using NTP, and the time agrees, almost to the second,
>with
>> that of network time services and other machines, I doubt there's
>even a 30
>> second variance.
>>
>> What's the strategy for dealing with this? Seems like it isn't an
>isolated
>> problem.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas Leavitt
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David
>> Sommerseth
>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:51 AM
>> To: Peter Boy; [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older
>than
>> what we have:"
>>
>> On 13/02/16 19:24, Peter Boy wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > since several months I  get constantly from anacreon:
>> >> ——————————<
>> > /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
>> >
>> > Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we
>have:
>> > Current   : Thu Feb  4 16:13:26 2016
>> > Downloaded: Thu Feb  4 16:13:25 2016
>> >> ——————————<
>> >
>> >
>> > The time difference is quite minimal. And a manual „yum update“
>> > confirms that no updates are waiting.
>> >
>> > Using my favourite search engine I found it might have be caused by
>an
>> > unresponsive of lazy mirror. But I use the standard configuration,
>i.e.
>> > the mirror list just includes the three scientificlinux servers.
>Other
>> > entries refer old bugs long fixed.
>> >
>> > I tried a yum clean all but it didn’t fix it.
>> >
>> > And all our other don’t show this issue, but the configuration is
>all
>> > the same, at least according to my knowledge.
>> >
>> >
>> > Obviously, there is no harm done and it can be safely ignored. But
>it
>> > always pulls our issue alert button.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am seeing exactly the same.  I thought it was NTP issues related to
>my
>> own setup, where I have a local rsync mirror.  But then I installed
>from
>> scratch SL7 on another site without any local mirrors, and the same
>issue
>> appears there too.  So I see this both with public repositories as
>well as
>> local rsync repositories.
>>
>> I have also seen this on SL6, but not as frequent as on SL7.
>>
>> Even though they cause no obvious harm, it gets quite annoying when
>you
>> receive many of them during a day ... sometimes even several days in
>a row.
>>
>> Perhaps yum should be more graceful to the timestamp?  And just quiet
>> these messages if the time difference is less than 30 seconds or so.
>>
>>
>> --
>> kind regards,
>>
>> David Sommerseth
>>
>> --
>> kind regards,
>>
>> David Sommerseth
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If
>you are
>> not the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use,
>distribute, copy
>> or rely upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the
>> sender by reply e-mail, and then delete this message and its
>attachment(s).
>> EAG, Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any errors,
>> omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachments.
>>
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2