SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
lejeczek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:15:27 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
There might be no need to be sad, I think.
Simple principles should prevail - and if with such a change 
we will get bigger user base, more developers working more 
closely together, the same one Bugzilla for everything 
then.. it can only be better for the software, better for 
everybody. Especially when so much is shared already. 
Everything else, any differences can, should always be 
discussed then agreed upon, only if people are willing.
bw.

On 12/01/16 09:51, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Indeed a very interesting question, I will follow the answers.
> I was and I am very happy with the work done in SL 6.x. So I'm sad
> to see that there might be a change in direction.
>
> Best regards
> Andreas
>
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-
>> [log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von lejeczek
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Januar 2016 10:48
>> An: SCIENTIFIC- LINUX- USERS@ FNAL. GOV
>> Betreff: a year later - CERN move to Centos - what are we doing?
>>
>> hi everybody,
>>
>> I've wondered and got curious, what do you guys, gals think
>> about that move?
>> More importantly do you think it's a step we SL users should
>> also consider?
>> CERN mention there were talks between them, Fermilab - what
>> are Fermilab plans with regards to future releases, with
>> regards to SL in general? (Not much info on the website.)
>> I personally am just about to trial a migration from SL7 to
>> Centos. I'm thinking it's inevitable, am I wrong?
>>
>> best wishes.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2