SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Sommerseth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:54:31 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
On 05/11/15 09:38, Benjamin Lefoul wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If the btrfs filesystem on SL7 mature enough for a production environment?
> According to Sanders van Vugt it was not even available in RHEL 7.0, but will be (is?) in updates…

I would claim that btrfs is NOT ready for primetime production where
your data is precious.  If your intention is to use it on systems where
you have good backups to get acquainted with it, test it in a broader
scale and do bug reporting, then it is probably fine.

Btrfs have also been a topic on a few conferences I've been on over the
years (like devconf.cz), and file system developers doing btrfs
presentations have often said that btrfs still needs to be treated
carefully.  It just takes time to develop and mature an advanced file
system.

In addition I would also say that once RHEL puts it in a release ready
for production, that's the point where you can begin to have real
confidence in the file system.  Currently I believe it is only available
as a technology preview.  More on technology preview can be found here:
<https://access.redhat.com/support/offerings/techpreview>

On the other hand, I am conservative and very careful when it comes to
data integrity.


--
kind regards,

David Sommerseth

ATOM RSS1 RSS2