SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:28:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Steve Gaarder <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I always thought that /usr/local was defined to be an area left alone by the
> operating system.  For many years, we have made it a symlink to a read-only
> directory in AFS space.  This has worked fine - until now. When I tried to
> update the "filesystem" package, it failed because it tried to do chmods on
> (at least) /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/etc.  Why is it doing this?  Is
> /usr/local no longer truly local?
>
> thanks,

ATOM RSS1 RSS2