SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:44:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I must run a variety of web browser applications.  One of these is
> seamonkey.
>
> Diagnostics:
>
> [root@linux-3iz7 opt]# seamonkey/seamonkey
> XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /opt/seamonkey/libxul.so:
> libfreetype.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> Couldn't load XPCOM.
> [root@linux-3iz7 opt]# yum install libfreetype.so.6
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, nvidia
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package freetype.i686 0:2.4.11-10.el7_1.1 will be installed

Yasha, you are the *only* person I've seen pursuing your
"polymorphism" model of system compatibility.



> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error:  Multilib version problems found. This often means that the root
>        cause is something else and multilib version checking is just
>        pointing out that there is a problem. Eg.:
>
>          1. You have an upgrade for freetype which is missing some
>             dependency that another package requires. Yum is trying to
>             solve this by installing an older version of freetype of the
>             different architecture. If you exclude the bad architecture
>             yum will tell you what the root cause is (which package
>             requires what). You can try redoing the upgrade with
>             --exclude freetype.otherarch ... this should give you an error
>             message showing the root cause of the problem.
>
>          2. You have multiple architectures of freetype installed, but
>             yum can only see an upgrade for one of those architectures.
>             If you don't want/need both architectures anymore then you
>             can remove the one with the missing update and everything
>             will work.
>
>          3. You have duplicate versions of freetype installed already.
>             You can use "yum check" to get yum show these errors.
>
>        ...you can also use --setopt=protected_multilib=false to remove
>        this checking, however this is almost never the correct thing to
>        do as something else is very likely to go wrong (often causing
>        much more problems).
>
>        Protected multilib versions: freetype-2.4.11-10.el7_1.1.i686 !=
> freetype-2.4.11-9.el7.x86_64
> [root@linux-3iz7 opt]#

It looks like you have mismatched versions of freetype. Update both
freetype.x86_^4 and freetype.i686 in the same installation steps.
i.e., yous "yum install freetype" or "dnf install freetype", and you
should be fine for that individual component and its dependencies. I'm
not sure why the dependency wasn't already handled. That's a common
problem when you have exclusions written into your yum version, or if
your repodata is weirdly out of date. But both the x86_64 and i686
versions of freetype-2.4.11-10.el7_1.1 are in the security update, I
can see them.

> There does not seem to a X86-64 tar.bz2 runnable binary for Seamonkey, only
> an IA-32 version, but polymorphism for the above
> support application (freetype) does not seem to be possible.  Any
> suggestions would be kindly appreciated.  The environment is SL 7.1 not yet
> fully updated to SL 7x.   ElRepo and EPEL repositories also are used for
> applications that are not readily available in
> the "stock" repo.

It should be recompilable from a SRPM. I see that there are SRPM's for
Fedora 22, perhaps you could backport them?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2