On 16/06/15 14:52, lejeczek wrote:
> On 10/12/13 15:14, Peter van Hooft wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Paul Robert
>> Marino wrote:
>>> You have to download the RPM's from Glusters yum repos.
>>> They purposely removed it from EPEL because the Gluster
>>> 3.4 client is
>>> now included in RHEL and the server version which was in
>>> EPEL was too
>>> old to work with the client included with RHEL,
>>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/
>>> you have to pick the right repo for the version you want
>>> for example 3.4 is here
>>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0/RHEL/epel-6/x86_64/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter van Hooft
>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:05:02AM -0600, Pat Riehecky
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 12/10/2013 02:53 AM, Peter van Hooft wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When updating my 6.4 system, glusterfs release
>>>>>> 3.4.0.36rhs-1 was available from sl-security.
>>>>>> However, since I had glusterfs-server 3.2.7-1 from
>>>>>> EPEL installed, the update failed since
>>>>>> glusterfs-server 3.4.0.36rhs-1 from SL6 is not
>>>>>> available.
>>>>>> Does anyone have an idea when this package will be
>>>>>> published? Do I have to wait for SL6.5?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter van Hooft
>>>>> I'm afraid the glusterfs-server package is not in SL 6.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've only got
>>>>> glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>> The upstream announcement (BA-2013-1641) does not list
>>>>> the server
>>>>> package either.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pat
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pat Riehecky
>>>>>
>>>>> Scientific Linux developer
>>>>> http://www.scientificlinux.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I downloaded the source rpm and rebuilt it with --with
>>>> server
>>>> The glusterfs-server package gets built nicely.
>>>> I couldn't find any references to why SL6 don't offer
>>>> it though, except
>>>> for a discussion on EPEL if they would drop *their*
>>>> glusterfs packages.
>>>> The SL6 glusterfs packages on the other hand (to be
>>>> precise: the glusterfs-api
>>>> package) are needed for other package upgrades.
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>> I believe RedHat doesn't offer glusterfs-server because
>> they made that into a layered product for their
>> storage appliance. But why can't SL offer it?
>> I'll discuss moving to the glusterfs.org repos with the
>> team here.
>> Thanks all.
>>
>> Peter
>>
> and the story continues with rhel 7.x, right?
> still no plans?
>
thanks,
also a good alternative would be include, just like for epel
& elrepo, glusterfs' repo releases/yum-confs?
I bet many people use it, would be quick.
|