The glusterfs-server rpm has now been included in sl-addons for SL 6.x.
This came out of a need to pull it into HELiOS for one of our internal product teams.
It is generated via the small change to TUV's SPEC file to have the glusterfs-server package also built.
For the time being Pat and I decided it best to place it into sl-addons for 6.6, and then consider moving it in to core for 6.7.
regards,
- Chris
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] glusterfs
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:52:27 +0100
From: lejeczek <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
To: Peter van Hooft <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>, Paul Robert Marino <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
CC: Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
On 10/12/13 15:14, Peter van Hooft wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
>> You have to download the RPM's from Glusters yum repos.
>> They purposely removed it from EPEL because the Gluster 3.4 client is
>> now included in RHEL and the server version which was in EPEL was too
>> old to work with the client included with RHEL,
>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__download.gluster.org_pub_gluster_glusterfs_&d=AwMCaQ&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=k6oKZI9weMoc8LXiW22fgCr4b3qBxTlgzDRcLcUS7m4&m=l9ghOlGXJZFc5fqcqBquKoY512TE9SWS6ciWJX9qvu0&s=4j7cgoO4YLnoE0b73Fy3u53v-t34iWb5xoAxbEL2QAQ&e=>
>> you have to pick the right repo for the version you want for example 3.4 is here
>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0/RHEL/epel-6/x86_64/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__download.gluster.org_pub_gluster_glusterfs_3.4_3.4.0_RHEL_epel-2D6_x86-5F64_&d=AwMCaQ&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=k6oKZI9weMoc8LXiW22fgCr4b3qBxTlgzDRcLcUS7m4&m=l9ghOlGXJZFc5fqcqBquKoY512TE9SWS6ciWJX9qvu0&s=4-_3hZpFnVzAi9E6ISLmD8OxzqvSeRWnA2VWw9DRxmE&e=>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter van Hooft
>> <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:05:02AM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/2013 02:53 AM, Peter van Hooft wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> When updating my 6.4 system, glusterfs release 3.4.0.36rhs-1 was available from sl-security.
>>>>> However, since I had glusterfs-server 3.2.7-1 from EPEL installed, the update failed since
>>>>> glusterfs-server 3.4.0.36rhs-1 from SL6 is not available.
>>>>> Does anyone have an idea when this package will be published? Do I have to wait for SL6.5?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter van Hooft
>>>> I'm afraid the glusterfs-server package is not in SL 6.
>>>>
>>>> I've only got
>>>> glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>
>>>> The upstream announcement (BA-2013-1641) does not list the server
>>>> package either.
>>>>
>>>> Pat
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Pat Riehecky
>>>>
>>>> Scientific Linux developer
>>>> http://www.scientificlinux.org/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.scientificlinux.org_&d=AwMCaQ&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=k6oKZI9weMoc8LXiW22fgCr4b3qBxTlgzDRcLcUS7m4&m=l9ghOlGXJZFc5fqcqBquKoY512TE9SWS6ciWJX9qvu0&s=jnNe2DbaXRwyMR7XthnEFrA7DcSUVmy4qYpOtZardCM&e=>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I downloaded the source rpm and rebuilt it with --with server
>>> The glusterfs-server package gets built nicely.
>>> I couldn't find any references to why SL6 don't offer it though, except
>>> for a discussion on EPEL if they would drop *their* glusterfs packages.
>>> The SL6 glusterfs packages on the other hand (to be precise: the glusterfs-api
>>> package) are needed for other package upgrades.
>>>
>>> Peter
> I believe RedHat doesn't offer glusterfs-server because they made that into a layered product for their
> storage appliance. But why can't SL offer it?
> I'll discuss moving to the glusterfs.org repos with the team here.
> Thanks all.
>
> Peter
>
and the story continues with rhel 7.x, right?
still no plans?
|
