On 10/12/13 15:14, Peter van Hooft wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
>> You have to download the RPM's from Glusters yum repos.
>> They purposely removed it from EPEL because the Gluster 3.4 client is
>> now included in RHEL and the server version which was in EPEL was too
>> old to work with the client included with RHEL,
>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/
>> you have to pick the right repo for the version you want for example 3.4 is here
>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0/RHEL/epel-6/x86_64/
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter van Hooft
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:05:02AM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/2013 02:53 AM, Peter van Hooft wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> When updating my 6.4 system, glusterfs release 3.4.0.36rhs-1 was available from sl-security.
>>>>> However, since I had glusterfs-server 3.2.7-1 from EPEL installed, the update failed since
>>>>> glusterfs-server 3.4.0.36rhs-1 from SL6 is not available.
>>>>> Does anyone have an idea when this package will be published? Do I have to wait for SL6.5?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter van Hooft
>>>> I'm afraid the glusterfs-server package is not in SL 6.
>>>>
>>>> I've only got
>>>> glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>> glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>>>
>>>> The upstream announcement (BA-2013-1641) does not list the server
>>>> package either.
>>>>
>>>> Pat
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Pat Riehecky
>>>>
>>>> Scientific Linux developer
>>>> http://www.scientificlinux.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I downloaded the source rpm and rebuilt it with --with server
>>> The glusterfs-server package gets built nicely.
>>> I couldn't find any references to why SL6 don't offer it though, except
>>> for a discussion on EPEL if they would drop *their* glusterfs packages.
>>> The SL6 glusterfs packages on the other hand (to be precise: the glusterfs-api
>>> package) are needed for other package upgrades.
>>>
>>> Peter
> I believe RedHat doesn't offer glusterfs-server because they made that into a layered product for their
> storage appliance. But why can't SL offer it?
> I'll discuss moving to the glusterfs.org repos with the team here.
> Thanks all.
>
> Peter
>
and the story continues with rhel 7.x, right?
still no plans?
|
