SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:07:39 -0500
Reply-To:
Ken Teh <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
ld-linux.so.2
From:
Ken Teh <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory
Comments:
To: scientific-linux-users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines) 
I have a user who has installed an executable built on a other Linux distro.  Claims it was built on a 64-bit linux (doubtful).  He has no problems running it on a 32-bit SL6.x machine but cannot run it on a 64-bit SL6.x machine.  Chokes with the following:

...:/lib/ld-linux.so: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory.

I'm wondering if it is "safe" to add a symbolic link to the ld-linux-x86_64.so.2 to fix this.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2