SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:26:06 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
That's a bit odd....

The SRPMS directory within the various '6.#' directories is a symbolic link to 6x/SRPMS/ so it should be automatically detected by rsync as identical and treated as such.......

Pat
________________________________________
From: Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Kenneth MacDonald [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:10 PM
To: scientific-linux-users
Subject: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Hard links no longer maintained?

While experimenting with a local mirror over rsync, I notice that the
Scientific Linux doesn't seem to be maintaining hard links between
source RPMs anymore.

For example ...

6.4/SRPMS/vendor/at-3.1.10-44.el6_5.2.src.rpm
6.5/SRPMS/vendor/at-3.1.10-44.el6_5.2.src.rpm

However, the older files ...

6.4/SRPMS/vendor/at-3.1.10-42.el6.src.rpm
6.5/SRPMS/vendor/at-3.1.10-42.el6.src.rpm

... are hard linked.

In 6.[45]/SRPMS/vendor, the oldest non-hardlinked files are both ...

-rw-r--r-- 1 root   root     2254830 Oct 15  2012 tar-1.23-9.el6.src.rpm

But they have the same md5sum, so I would expect them to be hard linked.

Is this something that is already known?  Perhaps it's the upstream
vendor's change in behaviour?

Cheers,

Kenny.





--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2