Like I say, our government is totally disorganized and overbloated. Law 
enforcement should be part of DoJ not Treasury. But, we gotta waste money 
somehow so we get a mishmash of a hodgepodge. 'nuff said - except to note that I 
wanted a chance to live enough that I illegally carried a .38 special for most 
of that year and slept with it under the pillow. Surrender is for victims. I 
gave up being a victim and liked the feeling.

{o.o}

On 2014-10-05 06:27, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> That is because the secret service is part of the treasury department oddly
> enough. Even though they are most know for protecting the president they are
> actually a law enforcement agency.
>
>
>
> -- Sent from my HP Pre3
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Oct 5, 2014 2:54 AM, jdow <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> If credit card fraud was involved you might check with the Secret Service. At
> least in the mid 80s credit card fraud was investigated by the Secret Service.
> I've no freaking idea why; but, during an investigation about some online
> stalking featuring me as one of the victims credit card fraud was involved. I
> was interviewed about it by a Secret Service agent and an FBI agent
> concurrently. Both were just a touch out of their depth. Sigi Kluger was
> ultimately prosecuted for the CC fraud, not the stalking, not the death threats,
> not the bodily harm (chop me up and feed me to his dog) but CC fraud that was
> small amounts over a full year. VERY few women stayed with McGraw-Hill's "BIX"
> or "Byte Information eXchange" through that year. I was too damn stubborn to be
> run out. But - damn - CC fraud was the Secret Service's domain? Washington DC
> was hopelessly screwed up even then.
>
> {^_^} Joanne
>
> On 2014-10-04 21:26, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
>  > you may be right Interpol's economic crimes division might be the
>  > right way to go Ive never considered that before.
>  >
>  >
>  > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  >> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Bill Maidment <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  >>> There used to be an organisation called Interpol to deal with international
> crime. I haven't heard anything recent about them; do they still exist?
>  >>>
>  >>> Regards
>  >>> Bill Maidment
>  >>
>  >> Interpol still exists, they've a web site hat
>  >> https://www.interpol.int/. Since we've gone way off this mailing
>  >> list's announced purpose, I'll stop here.
>  >