Thanks for the reply, Pat.

In that case, I will attempt to rebuild the sources myself. I would greatly appreciate any patches, documentation, or advice that you may already have, even if it is unsupported by the SL at this time.

Thanks again,
Lincoln

On Oct 20, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Satellite 6 is something I (Pat Riehecky, not SL as a whole) am interested in, but with the recent release of 6.6 it is not clear when there will be some time for more detailed investigation on build support and maintenance for Satellite 6.  It does look nifty.
> 
> Thanks for the interest!
> 
> Pat
> 
> On 10/15/2014 02:45 PM, Lincoln Bryant wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> Thanks for the pointer.
>> 
>> My understanding is that the feature set isn't quite the same in Satellite 6. It seems that TUV is using Foreman/Pulp/Candlepin/Katello to replace the functionality currently provided by Spacewalk.
>> 
>> --Lincoln
>> 
>> On Oct 15, 2014, at 2:35 PM, Mark Stodola wrote:
>> 
>>> On 10/15/2014 02:19 PM, Lincoln Bryant wrote:
>>>> Greetings devs,
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any plans to rebuild Red Hat Satellite 6 for SL? My group is very interested in experimenting with some of the lifecycle management and provisioning features of the latest version.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Lincoln Bryant
>>>> 
>>> Have you tried Spacewalk?
>>> http://spacewalk.redhat.com/faq.html#compare
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Mark
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Mr. Mark V. Stodola
>>> Senior Control Systems Engineer
>>> 
>>> National Electrostatics Corp.
>>> P.O. Box 620310
>>> Middleton, WI 53562-0310 USA
>>> Phone: (608) 831-7600
>>> Fax: (608) 831-9591
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pat Riehecky
> 
> Scientific Linux developer
> http://www.scientificlinux.org/
>