SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Mosgalin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vladimir Mosgalin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:23:12 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Hi John Rowe!

 On 2014.09.25 at 10:26:53 +0100, John Rowe wrote next:

> On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 09:16 +0000, Werf, C.G. van der (Carel) wrote:
> > Yesterday a lot of yum-updates ran to update to the latest bash-versions.
> > 
> > Though my /bin/bash was changed last night, and yum.log shows 3.2.33 should have installed, 
> > # /bin/bash --version still shows 3.2.25
> > 
> > Ofcourse, also # strings /bin/bash  shows old version number.
> > 
> > Is this a policy NOT to change version-numbers ? 
> 
> It's worth pointing out that there has just been a serious (and possibly
> remote!) bash vulnerability which this fixes. 
> 
> A test is:
> 
> env X="() { :;} ; echo vulnerable" /bin/bash -c "echo completed"
> 

The only problem is that vulnerability is not yet fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141597#c24

We need to wait for further fixes

-- 

Vladimir

ATOM RSS1 RSS2