SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:30:03 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Excerpts from Werf, C.G. van der (Carel)'s message of 2014-09-25 11:16:35 +0200:
> Yesterday a lot of yum-updates ran to update to the latest bash-versions.
> 
> Though my /bin/bash was changed last night, and yum.log shows 3.2.33 should have installed, 
> # /bin/bash --version still shows 3.2.25
> 
> Ofcourse, also # strings /bin/bash  shows old version number.
> 
> Is this a policy NOT to change version-numbers ? 

The version of bash has not changed. Only the release number. i.e additional
patches ontop of bash version 3.2.25.

Run

rpm -q --changelog bash | less

should give a clue as to patches being applied

Steve



> 
> Regards,
> Carel 

-- 
-- 
Steve Traylen, CERN IT.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2