On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

> It's quite galling: the current semi-manual re-assembly of 
> local branches, based on "git log" entries, is winding up 
> lauded as sufficient and superior because, frankly, it's the 
> only thing that's currently supported.

Nico 

I get it -- you are unhappy about unsigned SRPMS.  I am 
located in the US and so readily subject of the reach the 
upstream as a target for litigation on perceived EULA / terms 
of use / etc violations.  I won't be exposing such a tool 
publicly, but then ...

If you (seemingly offshore from the upstream) really cannot 
afford the funds for a subscription, and will do the coding of 
a mrepo / satellite / whatever proxy to retrieve the signed 
sources, please ... pass the hat, buy a subscription, and just 
sit down and write the code.  It would seem (but you should 
satisfy yourself) that your downside risk is that they will 
turn off such a subscription

But is is not productive (for you) to carp over and over 
without taking steps to address your concern, nor (for others) 
reading mailing lists to wade through 're-runs' of your 
concern

Thanks

-- Russ herrold