Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:51:38 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi David,
Thank you for that. A valuable piece of information for the future.
Regards
Andreas Mock
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: David Sommerseth [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. September 2014 16:52
> An: Andreas Mock; Patrick J. LoPresti; Pat Riehecky
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Betreff: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Questions about SL 7.0
>
> On 03/09/14 10:33, Andreas Mock wrote:
> > Hi Pat, hi Patrick,
> >
> > thanks for your answers and comments.
> >
> > How would someone like me get a SRPM for a binary package found or
> > installed on a SL 7.0 system?
>
> yumdownloader --source $PKGNAME
>
>
> --
> kind regards,
>
> David Sommerseth
>
>
>
> >> Von: Patrick J. LoPresti [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 23:22
> >> An: Pat Riehecky
> >> Cc: Andreas Mock; [log in to unmask]
> >> Betreff: Re: AW: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Questions about SL 7.0
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The sources were taken from git. They were then compared to the
> >>> sources from the public Release Candidate provided by upstream on
> >>> April
> >> 22 2014.
> >>> There were very few changes from this Release Candidate to the
> >>> official release.
> >>
> >> Nice work.
> >>
> >>> All the Security/Enhancement/Bugfix code comes out of git as the
> >>> source rpms for these were never publicly released.
> >>
> >> Does this mean there is no way to correlate security/bugfix updates
> >> from Red Hat with the changes in git, and therefore no way to know
> >> how far SL is diverging from RHEL over time?
> >>
> >> Is the git tree entirely RHEL + released updates, or are unreleased
> >> CentOS changes mixed in as well?
> >>
> >> Presumably, anyone with a RHEL subscription (and the right tools)
> >> could compare the git repository against the update SRPMs, at least
> >> to tell you whether they are the same. Would that be a violation of
> >> the subscription terms, I wonder?
> >>
> >> Just curious.
> >>
> >> - Pat
>
>
> --
> kind regards,
>
> David Sommerseth
|
|
|